EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Randomized neighbor discovery protocols with collision detection for static multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks

Jose Vicente Sorribes (), Lourdes Peñalver (), Carlos Tavares Calafate () and Jaime Lloret ()
Additional contact information
Jose Vicente Sorribes: Universitat Politécnica de Valencia
Lourdes Peñalver: Universitat Politécnica de Valencia
Carlos Tavares Calafate: Universitat Politécnica de Valencia
Jaime Lloret: Universitat Politécnica de Valencia

Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, 2021, vol. 77, issue 3, No 9, 577-596

Abstract: Abstract Neighbor discovery represents a first step after the deployment of wireless ad hoc networks, since the nodes that form them are equipped with limited-range radio transceivers, and they typically do not know their neighbors. In this paper two randomized neighbor discovery approaches, called CDH and CDPRR, based on collision detection for static multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks, are presented. Castalia 3.2 simulator has been used to compare our proposed protocols against two protocols chosen from the literature and used as reference: the PRR, and the Hello protocol. For the experiments, we chose five metrics: the neighbor discovery time, the number of discovered neighbors, the energy consumption, the throughput and the number of discovered neighbors versus packets sent ratio. According to the results obtained through simulation, we can conclude that our randomized proposals outperform both Hello and PRR protocols in the presence of collisions regarding all five metrics, for both one-hop and multi-hop scenarios. As novelty compared to the reference protocols, both proposals allow nodes to discover all their neighbors with probability 1, they are based on collision detection and know when to terminate the neighbor discovery process. Furthermore, qualitative comparisons of the existing protocols and the proposals are available in this paper. Moreover, CDPRR presents better results in terms of time, energy consumption and number of discovered neighbors versus packets sent ratio. We found that both proposals achieve to operate under more realistic assumptions. Furthermore, CDH does not need to know the number of nodes in the network.

Keywords: Wireless ad hoc networks; Neighbor discovery; Collision detection; Randomized protocols; One-hop; Multi-hop (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-021-00763-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:telsys:v:77:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-021-00763-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/11235

DOI: 10.1007/s11235-021-00763-4

Access Statistics for this article

Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management is currently edited by Muhammad Khan

More articles in Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:77:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-021-00763-4