Predicting Mean and Bankfull Discharge from Channel Cross-Sectional Area by Expert and Regression Methods

Gokmen Tayfur () and Vijay Singh ()

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2011, vol. 25, issue 5, 1253-1267

Abstract: This study employed four methods—non-linear regression, fuzzy logic (FL), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and genetic algorithm (GA)-based nonlinear equation—for predicting mean discharge and bank-full discharge from cross-sectional area. The data compiled from the literature were separated into two groups—training (calibration) and testing (verification). Using training data sets, the methods were calibrated to obtain optimal values of the coefficients of the non-linear regression method; optimal number of fuzzy subsets, their base widths and fuzzy rules for the fuzzy method; and the optimal number of neurons in the hidden layer, the learning rate and momentum factor values for the ANN model. The GA-based method employed 100 chromosomes in the initial gene pool, 80% cross over rate and 4% mutation rate in determining the optimal values of the coefficients of the constructed nonlinear equation. The calibrated methods were then applied to the test data sets. The test results showed that the non-linear regression, ANN and GA-based methods were comparable in predicting the mean discharge while the fuzzy method produced high errors and low accuracy. The GA-based method had the highest accuracy of 75%. In terms of predicting bankfull discharge, all methods produced satisfactory results, although the fuzzy method had the lowest accuracy of 33%. The results of sensitivity analysis, which is limited to the GA-based and nonlinear regression methods, showed that the GA-based method calibrated with low bankfull discharge values can be successfully applied to predict high bankfull discharge values. This has important implications for predicting bankfull rates at ungauged sites. On the other hand, the sensitivity analysis results also showed that both the non-linear regression and GA-based methods have poor extrapolation capability for predicting mean discharge data. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Keywords: River; Mean discharge; Bank-full discharge; Cross section; Regression; ANN; Fuzzy; Genetic algorithm (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-010-9741-6 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:25:y:2011:i:5:p:1253-1267

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-010-9741-6

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().