Comparison and Validation of Selected Evapotranspiration Models for Conditions in Poland (Central Europe)

Paweł Bogawski () and Ewa Bednorz

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2014, vol. 28, issue 14, 5038 pages

Abstract: The FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PMF56) model is accepted as the standard method for estimating reference crop (grass) evapotranspiration. However, poor data availability limits the use of this method in many regions. This study aimed to overcome this limitation (1) by evaluating the goodness-of-fit of selected simple evapotranspiration methods in relation to the PMF56 model and (2) by adjusting four of these models and developing a multiple regression equation for conditions in Poland using the PMF56 model as a reference. Using daily meteorological data, four simple models were calibrated by the generalised reduced gradient (GRG) method; moreover, a multiple regression equation was developed on the basis of Cochrane-Orcutt estimation because the error term of the ordinary least squares model was autocorrelated. When radiation data were lacking and sunshine duration data were available, the PMF56 method with a calibrated Ångström-based estimation of solar radiation was the most accurate method (relative error, RE = 0.096, for Sulejów). When neither radiation nor sunshine duration data were included in the dataset, the calibrated Penman method performed best (RE = 0.254). Moreover, when only temperature or pan evaporation data were available, the calibrated Hargreaves method provided the most accurate results (RE = 0.275). Much poorer results were obtained using the calibrated pan coefficient method (RE = 0.435). Ultimately, we developed a multiple regression method in this study that exhibited good performance (RE = 0.170). Taking into account the data limitations, the methods calibrated in this study are recommended for estimating evapotranspiration in Central Europe. This approach would substantially decrease the errors produced by the recommended non-calibrated equations. Copyright The Author(s) 2014

Keywords: Evaporation; Penman-Monteith FAO-56; optimisation; irrigation; Hargreaves (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-014-0787-8 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:14:p:5021-5038

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0787-8

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().