Are Weather Generators Robust Tools to Study Daily Reference Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Requirement?

Behnam Ababaei ()

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2014, vol. 28, issue 4, 915-932

Abstract: Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is one of the driving forces in crop simulation models and is very important to be estimated accurately. Moreover, weather generator (WG) models are widely used in combination with these crop models. As the quality of model output is related to the quality of weather data used as input, the evaluation of the sensitivity of model outputs to the quality of generated weather data is essential. In this study, eight different weather generator models were assessed and their outputs were used to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration and irrigation requirement. Two daily weather generator algorithms were combined with a monthly weather generator and/or an adjustment algorithm for low-frequency variances. Precipitation occurrence series was generated by an independent semi-empirical distribution. The daily weather generators outperformed the monthly models in reproducing daily statistics, while the monthly models performed better in simulating the monthly and yearly variations. After analyzing the model performances in simulating climatic variables, more assessments were carried out on ETo and irrigation requirement. The results depicted the strength of all the models in simulating daily ETo and irrigation requirement. Although all the studied models have comparable performances in simulating these two daily variables on daily and monthly scales, the monthly WGs outperform the daily models on yearly time scales and have better performances in simulating standard deviation values of yearly mean ETo and irrigation requirement. It can be concluded that WG models are robust tools for estimating these two daily variables if they can at least reproduce daily statistics (i.e. mean and standard deviation) well. But it must be taken in considerations that each WG model (including the one studied here) has different weaknesses and strengths and the best choice must be done according to the requirements. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Keywords: Weather generators; Reference ET; Irrigation requirement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-014-0524-3 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:4:p:915-932

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0524-3

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().