Ecological Regime versus Minimum Environmental Flow:Comparison of Results for a River in a Semi Mediterranean Region

Saeed Nikghalb, Alireza Shokoohi (), Vijay P. Singh and Ruihong Yu
Additional contact information
Saeed Nikghalb: Imam Khomeini International University
Alireza Shokoohi: Imam Khomeini International University
Vijay P. Singh: Texas A&M University
Ruihong Yu: Inner Mongolia University

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2016, vol. 30, issue 13, No 30, 4969-4984

Abstract: Abstract Maintaining Environmental Flow (EF) plays a critical role in protecting rivers and their ecosystems. Because of shortage of data and limited financial resources in developing countries, there is a tendency to use simple hydrologic methods against comprehensive EF assessment methods. In this research, two most common hydrologic methods (Tennant and Q95) were compared with a habitat simulation method (PHABSIM) under the condition of data shortage. It was concluded that while the results of habitat simulation method even using imprecise input data were justified, the impacts of implementing EF discharges of the two hydrologic methods on the ecosystem might be irreversible. It was found that the Tennant and Q95 methods led to dramatically low discharges as fixed minimum environmental flows, while habitat simulation method gave an acceptable ecological regime. In the absence of ecological data and after deciding on the target species in a case study in the southern part of the Caspian Sea, a special Delphi technique was employed for preparing the suitability data. For enhancing the PHABSIM hydraulic module results, HEC-RAS was implemented for hydraulic simulation and then with a simple modification on average velocity, the cross-sectional velocity distribution for deriving the Weighted Usable Area (WUA) was generated. It was found that this method along with maintaining high flows in the river preserved Mean Annual Flow (MAF) during wet months and preserved Mean Annual Low Flow (MALF) during dry months which is equal to maintaining Environmental Flow Requirement (EFR) in such a way that provides the river with an ecological regime near its historical one and guarantees river health.

Keywords: River restoration; Environmental flow; Habitat simulation; PHABSIM; Tennant method; Ecological regime (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-016-1488-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:30:y:2016:i:13:d:10.1007_s11269-016-1488-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1488-2

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().