Assessing the Accuracy of GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process for Watershed Prioritization; Gorganrood River Basin, Iran

Omid Rahmati (), Ali Haghizadeh () and Stefanos Stefanidis ()
Additional contact information
Omid Rahmati: Lorestan University
Ali Haghizadeh: Lorestan University
Stefanos Stefanidis: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2016, vol. 30, issue 3, No 15, 1150 pages

Abstract: Abstract Watershed prioritization based on the natural and anthropogenic factors involves by locating the critical areas of flood hazard, which cause socio-economic and environmental consequences to take up mitigation activities on priority basis. The pair-wise comparisons of natural and anthropogenic factors is a bit problematic, because these two mentioned factors are different from typology view point. In order to assess flood hazard potential by using (1) only natural factors (FHPNF), (2) only anthropogenic factors (FHPAF), and (3) ensemble the obtained sub-watersheds priorities from natural and anthropogenic factors , the coupling of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) were applied the Gorganrood river basin of Iran. Each effective factor was assigned to appropriate weight based on Saaty’s 9 point scale and the obtained weights were normalized through the Eigenvector method. By using the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC), two flood hazard potential indexes were defined separately for anthropogenic and natural factors. Finally, both indices values were combined to determine sub-watersheds priority. For the validation of the predictions, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and historical data of flash flood events were used. According to the results of ROC curves, the FHPNF and FHPAF maps showed a reasonable good performance in watershed prioritization with area under ROC curve (AUC) values of 76.1 and 79.5 %, respectively. In addition, these results imply that one and two sub-watersheds fall under very high and high priority, respectively. The results of this study act as guidelines for managers and planners to determine sub-watersheds priority and rational management of watersheds based on both natural and anthropogenic components.

Keywords: Watershed prioritization; AHP; ROC curve; Flood hazard; GIS; Iran (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-015-1215-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:30:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11269-015-1215-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-015-1215-4

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().