Developing a Snowmelt Forecast Model in the Absence of Field Data

Eric A. Sproles (), Tim Kerr, Cristian Orrego Nelson and David Lopez Aspe
Additional contact information
Eric A. Sproles: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas
Tim Kerr: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas
Cristian Orrego Nelson: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas
David Lopez Aspe: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2016, vol. 30, issue 7, No 29, 2590 pages

Abstract: Abstract In data poor regions predicting water availability is a considerable challenge for water resource managers. In snow-dominated watersheds with minimal in situ measurements, satellite imagery can supplement sparse data networks to predict future water availability. This technical note presents the first phase of an operational forecast model in the data poor Elqui River watershed located in northern Central Chile (30°S). The approach applies remotely-sensed snow cover products from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) instrument as the first order hydrologic input for a modified Snowmelt Runoff Model. In the semi-arid Elqui River, snow and glacier melt are the dominant hydrologic inputs but precipitation is limited to up to six winter events annually. Unfortunately winter access to the Andean Cordillera where snow accumulates is incredibly challenging, and thus measurements of snowpack are extremely sparse. While a high elevation snow monitoring network is under development, management decisions regarding water resources cannot wait as the region is in its eighth consecutive year of drought. Our model applies a Monte Carlo approach on monthly data to determine relationships between lagged changes in snow covered area and previous streamflow to predict subsequent streamflow. Despite the limited data inputs the model performs well with a Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency and R2 of 0.830 and 0.833 respectively. This model is not watershed specific and is applicable in other regions where snow dominates hydrologic inputs, but measurements are minimal.

Keywords: Snowmelt runoff; Hydrological model; Remote sensing; Hydrological prediction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-016-1271-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:30:y:2016:i:7:d:10.1007_s11269-016-1271-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1271-4

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().