Why Should Practitioners be Concerned about Predictive Uncertainty of Groundwater Management Models?

H. Delottier (), A. Pryet and A. Dupuy
Additional contact information
H. Delottier: Bordeaux INP and Univ. Bordeaux Montaigne, ENSEGID
A. Pryet: Bordeaux INP and Univ. Bordeaux Montaigne, ENSEGID
A. Dupuy: Bordeaux INP and Univ. Bordeaux Montaigne, ENSEGID

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2017, vol. 31, issue 1, No 5, 73 pages

Abstract: Abstract Numerical models are now commonly used to define guidelines for the sustainable management of groundwater resources. Despite significant advances in inverse modeling and uncertainty analysis, most of groundwater management models are still calibrated by manual trial and error and disregard predictive uncertainty. There is a gap between recent advances in inverse modeling and current practices in operational groundwater modeling. The disinterest of water practitioners for this issue can be explained by unawareness, lack of relevant and reliable datasets, difficulties of implementation and prohibitive computation times. The purpose of this study is to convince water practitioners and water managers that uncertainty analysis is not just a smart, optional add-on to a groundwater model, but rather a critical and necessary step. So as to broaden the audience of this paper out of the community of specialists, we use a simple didactic illustration and propose realistic, practical solutions. Based on a synthetic model, we highlight that if we follow common practices (parameter calibration solely against observed groundwater heads), our knowledge of the unknown parameters is not sufficient to constrain the predicted value of interest (the sustainable yield). This is a critical issue since management models are likely to be used for the design of legal frameworks. After this illustration, we argue that calibration algorithms should become a routine process to bring the uncertainty analysis to the forefront. We promote the use of a linear uncertainty analysis as a diagnostic tool for large real world groundwater management models. When uncertainty is high, stakeholders should encourage the collection of multiple data sets to expand the calibration data set and gather prior information on parameter values.

Keywords: Groundwater; Sustainable management; Predictive uncertainty; Inverse modeling; Calibration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-016-1508-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11269-016-1508-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1508-2

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().