A Method for Assessing and Predicting Water Quality Status for Improved Decision-Making and Management

Valeria Mijares, Margaret Gitau () and David R. Johnson
Additional contact information
Valeria Mijares: Purdue University
Margaret Gitau: Purdue University
David R. Johnson: Purdue University

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2019, vol. 33, issue 2, No 4, 509-522

Abstract: Abstract In this study, subindex formulations for key water quality parameters were developed and enhanced to incorporate water quality thresholds and criteria. The enhanced subindex formulations were built into the Unweighted Multiplicative Water Quality Index (UMWQI) and tested for suitability, with a focus on the Western Lake Erie Basin (WLEB). The modified UMWQI model integrates water quality criteria and thresholds set forth by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and state-level environmental agencies, to improve the water quality status. Monthly average subindex values for total suspended solids (TSS) ranged between 33 and 80 (ranking from “poor” to “very good”), those for total phosphorus ranged between 31 and 73 (ranking “poor” to “good”), while those for soluble reactive phosphorus ranged between 13 and 78 (ranking “unsuitable for all uses” to “good”). Overall index values ranged from 35 to 80 throughout the basin, indicating that water quality in the basin is generally “poor” to “good”, consistent with existing literature and water quality reports. Of the four sites that were being assessed, the River Raisin site tended to have the highest annual overall water quality index (cleanest system), with the Tiffin and Blanchard sites ranking the worst. All four sites had soluble reactive phosphorus as the worst ranking determinant, indicating that this is the determinant of greatest concern, also consistent with existing literature. Results indicated that UMWQI and associated subindices as developed were suitable for use within the WLEB. Methodologies and approaches developed are applicable in other areas experiencing similar concerns.

Keywords: Water quality; Water quality indices; Decision making and management; Water resources (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-018-2113-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-018-2113-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-2113-3

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().