Risk, Drinking Water and Harmful Algal Blooms: A Contingent Valuation of Water Bans

Marie-Pier Schinck, Chloé L’Ecuyer-Sauvageau (), Justin Leroux, Charlène Kermagoret and Jérôme Dupras
Additional contact information
Marie-Pier Schinck: HEC Montréal
Chloé L’Ecuyer-Sauvageau: Université du Québec en Outaouais
Justin Leroux: HEC Montréal
Charlène Kermagoret: Université du Québec en Outaouais
Jérôme Dupras: Université du Québec en Outaouais

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2020, vol. 34, issue 12, No 12, 3933-3947

Abstract: Abstract Facilities using surface water to provide drinking water to communities must contend with the risk of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin infiltration. Although risk management protocols can be put in place to anticipate the presence of cyanotoxins in concentrations exceeding guidelines, based on cyanobacterial cell count for example, this indicator is not infallible. The Canadian province of Quebec, among other jurisdictions, issues water bans when high concentrations of cyanotoxins are detected. While necessary, these bans are costly to communities. We perform a contingent valuation survey in areas at risk of being impacted by a water ban in the future to assess the preferences of residents and the economic value of detection and treatment tools that could eliminate cyanotoxins. The survey was completed by 240 people. Each respondent was asked a double-bounded dichotomous choice question. The scenario implied changes to the current situation regarding the possibility of predicting the presence of cyanotoxins in the facility, the average duration of water bans, the possibility of providing advance notice, all relative to the cost of these measures. The analysis of the survey responses allowed us to determine the willingness to pay (WTP) of households for diagnostic and treatment tools in drinking water facilities. Our analysis indicates that the mean WTP was $135 per household per year. Given that the experts developing the tools estimate the cost of implementation at $110 per household per year, our results suggest that implementation is economically viable.

Keywords: Water quality; Public health; Risk assessment; Water bans; Harmful algal blooms; Contingent valuation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-020-02653-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:34:y:2020:i:12:d:10.1007_s11269-020-02653-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02653-x

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().