Risk Management of Drinking Water Supply in Critical Conditions Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE V Technique
Mahsa Ghandi () and
Abbas Roozbahani ()
Additional contact information
Mahsa Ghandi: University of Tehran
Abbas Roozbahani: University of Tehran
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2020, vol. 34, issue 2, No 9, 595-615
Abstract:
Abstract Water crisis management in drinking water supply systems is a crucial issue. Many different natural and unnatural disasters cause great damages to these systems. Prioritizing effective strategies by expert decision-makers before any incidence can greatly reduce this damage. Moreover, cost minimization in the provision of these strategies is very essential as the urban crisis management organizations are financially limited. Therefore, this study provided a model for the selection of the most appropriate drinking water supply strategies in crisis conditions, considering possible limitations. Fuzzy PROMTHEE V, a multi-criteria decision-making method, is a new approach developed in this research to help the decision-makers in selecting a set of possible alternatives for drinking water supply management, which are ranked based on five criteria determined by decision-makers (water supply reliability, implementation speed and simplicity, implementation cost, social satisfaction, water quality) and budget limitation as the constraint for the optimization problem. This model was applied in a case study of Tehran city in Iran. Due to the uncertainties in expert opinions and parameters needed for drinking water supply risk management, this model was solved with three fuzzy methods and one non-fuzzy method, and the results were compared. Findings showed that strengthening passive defense in water supply, transportation, and distribution systems; providing water consumption management; encouraging people to save water for emergency conditions and planning to exploit popular forces and performing maneuvers are top-ranked alternatives.
Keywords: Risk management; Drinking water supply; PROMETHEE V; Fuzzy theory; Multi criteria decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-019-02460-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:34:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-019-02460-z
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-019-02460-z
Access Statistics for this article
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris
More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().