On the Applicability of the Expected Waiting Time Method in Nonstationary Flood Design

Lei Yan (), Lihua Xiong (), Qinghua Luan (), Cong Jiang (), Kunxia Yu () and Chong-Yu Xu ()
Additional contact information
Lei Yan: Hebei University of Engineering
Lihua Xiong: Wuhan University
Qinghua Luan: Hebei University of Engineering
Cong Jiang: China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
Kunxia Yu: Xi’an University of Technology
Chong-Yu Xu: University of Oslo

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2020, vol. 34, issue 8, No 19, 2585-2601

Abstract: Abstract Given a changing environment, estimating a flood magnitude corresponding to a desired return period considering nonstationarity is crucial for hydrological engineering designs. Four nonstationary design methods, namely expected waiting time (EWT), expected number of exceedances (ENE), equivalent reliability (ER), and average design life level (ADLL) have already been proposed in recent years. Among them, the EWT method needs to estimate design flood magnitudes by solving numerically. In addition, EWT requires estimating design quantiles for infinite lifespan, or extrapolation time (textra), to guarantee the convergence of the EWT solution under certain conditions. However, few studies have systematically evaluated pros and cons of the EWT method as to how to determine the textra and what kinds of misunderstandings on the applicability of the EWT method exist. In this study, we aim to provide the first investigation of various factors that influence the value of textra in the EWT method, and provide comprehensive comparison of the four methods from the perspectives of textra, design values and associated uncertainties. The annual maximum flood series (AMFS) of 25 hydrological stations, with increasing and decreasing trends, in Pearl River and Weihe River were chosen for illustrations. The results indicate that: (1) the textra of EWT is considerably affected by the trend of AMFS and the choice of extreme distributions. In other words, the textra of stations with increasing trends was significantly smaller than that of stations with decreasing trends, and the textra was also larger for distributions with heavier tail; (2) EWT produced larger design values than ENE for increasing trends, and both EWT and ENE yielded larger design values than ER and ADLL for higher return periods, while complete opposite results were obtained for decreasing trends.

Keywords: Nonstationary hydrological design; Extrapolation time; Expected waiting time; Expected number of exceedances; Equivalent reliability; Average design life level (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-020-02581-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:34:y:2020:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-020-02581-w

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02581-w

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().