Regional Flood Frequency Analysis Through Some Machine Learning Models in Semi-arid Regions

Pezhman Allahbakhshian-Farsani (), Mehdi Vafakhah (), Hadi Khosravi-Farsani () and Elke Hertig ()
Additional contact information
Pezhman Allahbakhshian-Farsani: Tarbiat Modares University
Mehdi Vafakhah: Tarbiat Modares University
Hadi Khosravi-Farsani: Shahrekord University
Elke Hertig: University of Augsburg

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2020, vol. 34, issue 9, No 16, 2887-2909

Abstract: Abstract The machine learning models (MLMs), including support vector regression (SVR), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), boosted regression trees (BRT), and projection pursuit regression (PPR) are compared to traditional method i.e. nonlinear regression (NLR) in regional flood frequency analysis (RFFA). In this study, the Karun and Karkheh watersheds, which is located in the southwestern of Iran, with the same climatic and physiographic conditions are considered. Fifty-four hydrometric stations with a period of 21 years (1993–2013) are selected based on the instructions of U.S. Federal Agencies Bulletin 17 B were applied for RFFA. The generalized normal (GNO) probability distribution function (PDF) is selected by the L-moment method among five PDFs, including the GNO, generalized Pareto (GP), generalized logistic (GL), generalized extreme value (GEV) and Pearson type 3 (P ІІІ) to estimate flood discharge for the expected return periods. Twenty-five predictor variables, such as physiographic, climatologic, geologic, soil and land use variables are extracted. Follow land, maximum 24-h rainfall, mean watershed slope, compactness coefficient, mean and maximum watershed elevation variables are recognized as the appropriate combination of input using gamma test (GT). The overall results indicate that the SVR, PPR, and MARS models in comparison to the NLR and BRT models have a better performance to estimate flood discharge with the expected return periods. Future, the SVR model based on radial basis function (RBF) kernel is chosen as the best model in terms of the mean of the Nash-Sutcliff coefficient (M-Ef) and the mean of relative root mean squared error (M-RMSEr) (i.e. 0.94 and 63.93, respectively) for different return periods.

Keywords: Regionalization; Data Driven models; Land use; Maximum instantaneous discharge; L-moment; Karun and Karkheh watersheds (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-020-02589-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:34:y:2020:i:9:d:10.1007_s11269-020-02589-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-020-02589-2

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().