Methodology for Allocation of Best Management Practices Integrated with the Urban Landscape
Ana Luiza Melo Rodrigues (),
Demetrius David Silva and
Frederico Carlos Martins Menezes Filho
Additional contact information
Ana Luiza Melo Rodrigues: Federal University of Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n, Campus da Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Demetrius David Silva: Federal University of Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n, Campus da Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Frederico Carlos Martins Menezes Filho: Institute of Exact and Technological Sciences, Federal University of Viçosa, Campus of Rio Paranaíba
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2021, vol. 35, issue 4, No 14, 1353-1371
Abstract:
Abstract Best management practices (BMP) seek to mimic the pre-development hydrological behavior by increasing infiltration and reducing runoff. However, its use worldwide is still scarce. This work presented a methodology for prioritizing areas for the allocation of BMP to counteract the negative effects of urbanization. It was proposed the allocation of bioretention cells, rain gardens, permeable pavement, green roof, and native vegetation landscaping. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was used to assess the efficiency of the practices used. The methodology for prioritizing areas identified places that most need intervention. This study showed that 93.7% of the studied catchment had a high and medium susceptibility to runoff generation. The methodology suggested that 54.2% of the catchment received some kind of BMP. The native vegetation landscaping was the most recommended practice. Despite the use of the BMP, some flooding points remained in the catchment, however, they decreased from 42 to 28. The runoff’s depth reduced from 85 to 23 mm while the infiltration increased from 12 to 38 mm. The methodology favored the upper areas of the catchment. It can be concluded that the allocation of the proposed practices showed good applicability. This work also allows local managers to take measures aiming the sustainability and water security and serves as a basis for future work and applications in other urban catchments.
Keywords: Low impact development; Priority areas; Runoff; Urban drainage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-021-02791-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:35:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11269-021-02791-w
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-02791-w
Access Statistics for this article
Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris
More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().