LiDAR based hydro-conditioned hydrological modeling for enhancing precise conservation practice placement in agricultural watersheds

Rallapalli Srinivas (), Matt Drewitz, Joe Magner, Harish Puppala, Ajit Pratap Singh and Riyadh Ibrahim Al-Raoush
Additional contact information
Rallapalli Srinivas: Birla Institute of Technology and Science
Matt Drewitz: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources
Joe Magner: University of Minnesota
Harish Puppala: BML Munjal University
Ajit Pratap Singh: Birla Institute of Technology and Science
Riyadh Ibrahim Al-Raoush: Qatar University

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2022, vol. 36, issue 10, No 25, 3877-3900

Abstract: Abstract High resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) improve hydrologic modeling and aid in identifying the targeted locations of best conservation practices (CPs) in agricultural watersheds. However, the inability of LiDAR data to represent the conveyance of water under or through the surfaces (i.e., bridges or culverts) impedes the simulated flow, resulting in false upstream pooling. Improper flow simulation affects the accuracy of pollutant load estimations and targeted locations delineated by watershed models or models built upon hydro-conditioned DEMs (hDEM). We propose a novel approach of Hydro-conditioning to modify LiDAR imagery through breach lines, which is essential to accurately replicate the landscape hydrologic connectivity. We compared variations in outcomes of Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF), based on manual and automated hDEMs for Plum Creek watershed, Minnesota. The derived flow network, catchment boundaries, drainage areas, locations/number of practices depend on the chosen hDEM. Locations, size and shape of bioreactors, drainage management, farm ponds, nutrient removal wetlands, riparian buffers are severely affected by hydro-conditioning. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) validation of hDEMs showed that Mean Average Percentage Deviation (MAPE) for automated and manual hDEMs is 1.34 and 0.998 respectively. Also, proximity analysis with a buffer of 200 m showed that CPs’ locations delineated by manual hDEM match better with the existing ones as compared to automated hDEM. Results indicate that coupled approach of using automated and manual ‘hDEM’ is best suited for guiding stakeholders towards the field-scale planning in a cost-saving manner.

Keywords: Conservation practices; Hydrological modeling; Hydro-conditioning; LiDAR-DEM; Watershed modeling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-022-03237-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03237-7

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03237-7

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().