EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Comparative Analysis of Data-Driven Models (SVR, ANFIS, and ANNs) for Daily Karst Spring Discharge Prediction

Akram Rahbar (), Ali Mirarabi (), Mohammad Nakhaei (), Mahdi Talkhabi () and Maryam Jamali ()
Additional contact information
Akram Rahbar: Kharazmi University
Ali Mirarabi: Water Resources Management Company (WRM)
Mohammad Nakhaei: Kharazmi University
Mahdi Talkhabi: Kharazmi University
Maryam Jamali: Kharazmi University

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2022, vol. 36, issue 2, No 10, 589-609

Abstract: Abstract Spring discharge always illustrates the groundwater-flux and aquifer storage oscillations. Because of inherent heterogeneity in karst environments, it is essential to mimic karst spring flows to acquire a superior understanding of hydrological processes and provide sustainable management and protection of karst waters. The framework of karst media is nonlinear and complex, which can be demonstrated by data-driven models. In this study, the performance of Support Vector Regression (SVR), the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) was assessed to predict spring discharge 1-, 3-, 7-, 10- and 14-day ahead. A hybrid Gamma Test-Genetic Algorithm was performed to establish an optimal input combination. SVR, ANFIS, and ANN performances were analyzed via four residuals: Correlation Coefficient, Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency, and Developed Discrepancy Ratio. According to the RMSE values (of 0.08, 0.18, 0.64 and 0.86 using ANN; 0.19, 0.22, 0.83, and 0.61 using ANFIS; and 0.15, 0.26, 0.78 and 0.59 using SVR for Lordegan, Deime, Dehcheshmeh, and Dehghara springs, respectively), the results demonstrated that ANN was highly accurate for the discharge prediction of the Lordegan, Deime, and Dehcheshme springs whereas it had the least accuracy for the discharge prediction of the Dehghara spring up to 14-day ahead. However, SVR performed better than the other models for all prediction steps in the Dehghara spring, having a more complex and heterogeneous flow system compared to the others. For all the springs, the models’ accuracy decreased as the time ahead increased.

Keywords: Data-driven models; Gamma test; Genetic algorithm; Karst spring; Prediction; Spring discharge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-021-03041-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-021-03041-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-03041-9

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:36:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11269-021-03041-9