Resolving Trans-Boundary Water Conflicts: Third-Party Mediation Using an Inverse Approach of GMCR Under Incomplete Preference Environments

Xiufen Gu, Lailei Gu, Dayong Wang () and Sajad Jamshidi
Additional contact information
Xiufen Gu: Hohai University
Lailei Gu: Northwest Normal University
Dayong Wang: Hohai University
Sajad Jamshidi: Purdue University

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2023, vol. 37, issue 15, No 13, 6088 pages

Abstract: Abstract Trans-boundary water conflicts and the ensuing social security have become concerning issues. However, the existing studies regarding trans-boundary water management mainly focus on river basin countries while ignoring the important role of third-party mediation institutions in resolving water conflicts. Thus, river basin countries and third-party mediation institutions are the objects of this research, which focuses on the strategies and behavior of third-party mediation institutions that are significant in alleviating conflict situations and formulating sustainable trans-boundary water resource allocation plans. The factors that influence the decision-making of third-party mediation institutions are determined based on other decision makers’ (DMs’) known preferences. Therefore, according to the uncertainty theory and the cognitive preference model, a novel inverse problem model of the graph model for conflict resolution is constructed to obtain the required DM preference information in complex and uncertain conflicts. Then, the new proposed method is applied to trans-boundary water conflicts in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin to illustrate its correctness and practicality. The results show that (1) a third-party management institution can directly promote a win–win situation among all DMs by obtaining other DMs’ preferences; (2) effective supervision by a third party can promote all those involved to reach a stable state faster; and (3) third parties can promote sustainable trans-boundary water resource allocation. The proposed methods and analysis results offer decision-making support for third-party management institutions in trans-boundary water resource conflicts and provide a scientific basis for mediating similar water resource conflicts within and beyond China.

Keywords: Trans-boundary water resources conflict; Graph model for conflict resolution; Inverse analysis; Incomplete preference relations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-023-03643-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:15:d:10.1007_s11269-023-03643-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-023-03643-5

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().