Improving Hydrological Modeling with Hybrid Models: A Comparative Study of Different Mechanisms for Coupling Deep Learning Models with Process-based Models

Yiming Wei (), Renchao Wang () and Ping Feng ()
Additional contact information
Yiming Wei: Tianjin University
Renchao Wang: Tianjin University
Ping Feng: Tianjin University

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2024, vol. 38, issue 7, No 12, 2488 pages

Abstract: Abstract Accurate hydrological modeling is crucial for water resources management. Process-based models (PBMs) are physically interpretable yet cannot fully utilize large datasets. Deep learning models, especially Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, have exhibited remarkable simulation accuracy but lack physical interpretability. To integrate the strengths of PBMs and LSTM, this paper develops three hybrid models (HLUDC, HLBDC, and HLBDCT) by coupling LSTM with the HBV model. HLUDC incorporates the output of HBV into LSTM to enhance modeling capability. HLBDC connects the HBV model to an LSTM that estimates the parameters of HBV. HLBDCT further introduces time-varying parameters. Notably, the possible limitation of these models in data-scarce basins is unclear, as all models are trained with available observations. Therefore, we further evaluate the impact of the training data length on model stability. The hybrid models are applied to the daily streamflow simulation in the Jialing River Basin. The results indicate that the hybrid models effectively enhance streamflow simulation compared to benchmark models. HLBDCT performs the best with a 2.44%-13.43% improvement in Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient over HBV and LSTM, followed by HLBDC, while HLUDC performs the least. HLBDCT also performed well in simulating extreme flow. Both HLBDCT and HLBDC accurately estimate actual evapotranspiration without being trained on it, demonstrating their robust physical coherence. Furthermore, HBV, HLBDC, and HLBDCT exhibit higher stability when trained with different lengths of data compared to HLUDC and LSTM. Overall, this study provides a better understanding of the potential for using hybrid models to enhance hydrological simulation accuracy.

Keywords: LSTM; HBV; Streamflow simulation; Actual evapotranspiration; Calibration; Data length (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03780-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03780-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03780-5

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().