Application of Machine Learning Approaches in Particle Tracking Model to Estimate Sediment Transport in Natural Streams

Saman Baharvand () and Habib Ahmari
Additional contact information
Saman Baharvand: The University of Texas at Arlington
Habib Ahmari: The University of Texas at Arlington

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2024, vol. 38, issue 8, No 14, 2905-2934

Abstract: Abstract Numerous empirical equations and machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged to forecast dispersion coefficients in open channels. However, the efficacy of certain learning-based models in predicting these coefficients remains unstudied. Also, the direct application of machine learning-derived dispersion coefficients to Lagrangian sediment transport models has not been investigated. The present study utilizes data from prior research to assess the performance of ensemble ML-based models, specifically, random forest regression (RFR) and gradient boosting regression (GBR) inn estimating longitudinal and transverse dispersion in natural streams. The optimal hyper-parameters of these ensemble models were fine-tuned using grid-search cross-validation. The ML-based dispersion models were then integrated into a Lagrangian particle tracking model (PTM) to simulate suspended sediment concentration in natural streams. Suspended sediment concentration distribution maps generated from developed PTM with ML-based dispersion coefficients were compared with field data. The findings indicated that the GBR model, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.95, outperformed the RFR model, which had an R2 of 0.9, in predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficients in a natural stream across both training and testing stages. However, during the testing phase, the RFR model with an R2 of 0.94 performed better than the GBR model with an R2 of 0.91 in predicting transverse dispersion. Both models consistently underestimated dispersion coefficients in both training and testing stages. Comparisons between the PTM with ensemble dispersion coefficients and empirical-based dispersion relationships revealed the superior performance of the GBR model compared to the other two methods.

Keywords: Sediment transport; Natural streams; Particle tracking model; Ensemble models; Machine learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-03798-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:38:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-024-03798-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-03798-9

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().