EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Estimating Potential and Reference Evapotranspiration in the Central European Region: The Challenge of Model Selection

Jitka Toušková (), Kristyna Falatkova () and Václav Šípek ()
Additional contact information
Jitka Toušková: Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Kristyna Falatkova: Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Václav Šípek: Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2025, vol. 39, issue 11, No 26, 5927 pages

Abstract: Abstract An accurate assessment of evapotranspiration (ET) is crucial for determining water balance, particularly in agricultural areas. However, misconceptions surrounding the definition and concept of ET contribute to significant uncertainty in its measurement and estimation. This study focuses on comparing the performance of 25 common models, including mass transfer, radiation-based, temperature-based, and combined methods. The results were compared with observed pan evaporation data from 18 stations across various climatic conditions in the temperate zone of the Czech Republic. The best results were achieved with the combined methods, which performed well in terms of both absolute values and daily patterns. The mean RMSEs between modeled and observed PET/RET were 1.2/18.6/33.3 mm day⁻¹/month⁻¹/season⁻¹, with correlation coefficients of 0.75, 0.94, and 0.75 for daily, monthly, and seasonal analyses, respectively. Individually, the radiation-based Makkink method (J Inst Water Eng 11:277–288, 1957) and the temperature-based approach by Oudin et al. (J Hydrol 303(1-4):290–306, 2005) stood out, both providing reliable results in terms of absolute PET values. The daily course was most accurately simulated by the Penman method (1963) and the WMO method (1966). Overall, model performance indicators such as RMSE and BIAS were more method-specific, whereas the correlation between modeled and observed data varied by station.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-025-04233-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04233-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-025-04233-3

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-10-03
Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04233-3