EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A New Integrated Water Quality Evaluation Approach Combined with Different Evaluation Methods Based on Weighted Membership Degree

Won-Chol Yang (), Jae-Bok Ri, Myong-Song Om, Jin-Sim Kim, Un-Ha Kim, Wi-Song Ri and Sun-Hak Sok
Additional contact information
Won-Chol Yang: Kim Chaek University of Technology
Jae-Bok Ri: Kim Chaek University of Technology
Myong-Song Om: Kim Chaek University of Technology
Jin-Sim Kim: Kim Chaek University of Technology
Un-Ha Kim: Kim Chaek University of Technology
Wi-Song Ri: Kim Chaek University of Technology
Sun-Hak Sok: Kim Chaek University of Technology

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), 2025, vol. 39, issue 8, No 4, 3679-3696

Abstract: Abstract Water quality evaluation (WQE) is very important for environment protection and management. There are many WQE methods, and the results from the different methods may differ with one another. However, it is unknown which is more reasonable method. The purpose of this paper is to develop a reasonable approach to determine the final WQ grades/ranks (WQGs) by integrating the WQGs from the individual methods. We develop a novel integrated WQE approach combined with multiple WQE methods based on weighted membership degree. It consists of the following steps: determining the WQGs of the evaluation objects using multiple WQE methods, determining priority weights of the individual methods, calculating weighted membership degrees that the object are evaluated to every grades/ranks, and calculating final WQG indices of the objects. It was applied to two application cases. The first case evaluated the final eutrophication grades of 12 lakes by integrating the grades from scoring index method, variable fuzzy sets method, hybrid fuzzy and optimal model, and neural network method. The second case evaluated the final WQ ranks of 29 wells by integrating the ranks from WQI method, compromise programing method with p = 1 and p = 2, ordered weighted averaging method, and TOPSIS method. In two cases, the proposed approach had the maximum correlation and minimum deviation from the other methods. It illustrated the reasonability of the proposed approach. It could be also used to integrate the environmental quality evaluation results obtained from various evaluation methods in many practical environmental quality evaluation problems.

Keywords: Water quality evaluation; Final water quality index; Final water quality grade; Weighted membership degree; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); Priority weight (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-025-04122-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04122-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11269

DOI: 10.1007/s11269-025-04122-9

Access Statistics for this article

Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) is currently edited by G. Tsakiris

More articles in Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA) from Springer, European Water Resources Association (EWRA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-07-01
Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:8:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04122-9