Spekulation mit Agrarrohstoffen – eine Replik

Ingo Pies ()

Wirtschaftsdienst, 2015, vol. 95, issue 11, 789-795

Abstract: The reply of Ingo Pies explains the background of the public quarrel over agricultural speculation and criticises three points which may hinder a productive debate. Christian Conrad responds that due to problems of methodology, investigations using econometrics can neither prove nor disprove any influence of speculation on prices, and he warns against drawing the wrong conclusions from the empirical studies. Copyright ZBW and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Keywords: F55; G13; Q11; Q31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10273-015-1903-y (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:95:y:2015:i:11:p:789-795

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... policy/journal/10273

DOI: 10.1007/s10273-015-1903-y

Access Statistics for this article

Wirtschaftsdienst is currently edited by Christian Breuer

More articles in Wirtschaftsdienst from Springer, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().