Standard or Sustainable - Which Offers Better Performance for the Passive Investor?

Daniel C. Khajenouri and Jacob H. Schmidt

Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2021, vol. 11, issue 1, 4

Abstract: This research report studies the risk-adjusted performance of the major international equity indices against their ESG screened equivalents (MSCI World, MSCI USA, MSCI Emerging Markets, and MSCI Europe). The daily closing prices, returns, standard deviations, and Sharpe ratio characteristics are analyzed from 2013 to 2020. The current literature available from highly rated journals on the subject is also considered, which provided mixed results on the subject matter. We found no academic papers focusing specifically on analyzing the performance of indices and their ESG screened equivalents. With this paper, we intend to fill this gap in the current research available. We conclude that for the passive investor, choosing ESG screened indices over the conventional equivalent has consistently provided better risk-adjusted returns over the long-term period. These findings are robust with the consistently higher Sharpe ratios over the eight-year period for each index. We predict ESG investments may continue to outperform due to changing retail and institutional investor preferences. Keywords: Sustainable, Passive, Investment, ESG, Asset, Management, Wealth.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%2011_1_4.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:11:y:2021:i:1:f:11_1_4

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Applied Finance & Banking from SCIENPRESS Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis ().