EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

THE EFFECTS OF RINGLEADER DISCRIMINATION ON CARTEL STABILITY AND DETERRENCE EXPERIMENTAL INSIGHTS

Michael Hesch ()
Additional contact information
Michael Hesch: Bundeskartellamt German Federal Cartel Office Germany Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT Institute of Economic Theory and Statistics Germany, Postal: DE

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2012, vol. 3, issue 1(5), 26-42

Abstract: Cartel ringleaders make significant contributions to enabling illegal collusive agreements to function According to US legislation ringleaders are excluded from corporate leniency programs Since 2002 under EU regulations ringleaders may qualify for a reduction of fines To date both antitrust laws treat cartel ringleaders differently We analyze the impact of this difference in a cartel experiment Given a low probability of detection through an authority we find that excluding ringleaders from leniency facilitates cartel formation stabilizes collusion and leads to significantly higher market prices The opposite holds for a high probability of detection Here the results are in line with the situation when every player can apply for leniency

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:3:y:2012:i:1(5):p:26-42

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics is currently edited by Madalina Constantinescu

More articles in Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics from ASERS Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Popirlan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:3:y:2012:i:1(5):p:26-42