International Standards in the Area of Combating the Financing of Terrorism and Extremism

Diana Bekbolatovna Baisagatova (), Madina Orynbaevna Kasimova (), Manara Uralchanovna Syzdykova () and Saken Talipbaevich Kemelbekov ()
Additional contact information
Diana Bekbolatovna Baisagatova: Department of Criminal Law and Criminology Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies under the Prosecutor General s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Akmola region Kosshy Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ
Madina Orynbaevna Kasimova: Research Center for the Public Security and Public Order Interdepartmental Research Institute Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies under the Prosecutor General s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Akmola region Kosshy Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ
Manara Uralchanovna Syzdykova: Research Center of Procedural Problems Interdepartmental Research Institute Academy of Law Enforcement Agencies under the Prosecutor General s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Akmola region Kosshy Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ
Saken Talipbaevich Kemelbekov: Marketing and Law Department Kazakh University of Economics Finance and International Trade Astana Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2016, vol. 7, issue 6, 1300-1310

Abstract: The paper deals with issues of defining international standards in the area of combating the financing of terrorism and extremism Regulatory legal acts issued by the UN since its founding to the present day regarding combating the financing of terrorism and extremism as well as corresponding acts of Council of Europe CIS others groups of states Republic of Kazakhstan are studied Legal acts adopted within the framework of the UN the CIS individual groups of states the Republic of Kazakhstan on the fight against terrorism separatism and extremism are analyzed A problem is identified that to the present day there s no uniform definition of such main legal notions used in this area as violence extremism war and terrorism terrorist organization extremist organization Another problem related to the world practice of recognizing an organization as terrorist is revealed Its two main mechanisms political and judicial are used in the world practice The political mechanism involves active participation of corresponding government bodies A court plays a key role in the recognizing an organization as terrorist in the judicial mechanism Certainly the judicial mechanism of recognizing organizations groups as terrorist is preferred In this case there are more guarantees of compliance with law justice impartiality as well as reservation of personal fundamental rights and freedoms The political mechanism of recognizing groups or organizations as terrorist suffers from the use of double standards On the basis of the undertaken research the author states that the Republic of Kazakhstan should come forward with an initiative concerning development of a UN regulatory legal act on the unification of international standards in the area of combating the financing of terrorism and extremism

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:6:p:1300-1310

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics is currently edited by Madalina Constantinescu

More articles in Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics from ASERS Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Popirlan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).