Trading in Influence Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Aspects

Zhanat Askarovna Mamitova (), Yerbol Omarov Agbayevich (), Askar Bolatovich Talkibayev () and Aigul Tanabugovna Irubayeva ()
Additional contact information
Zhanat Askarovna Mamitova: Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy Akmola region Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ
Yerbol Omarov Agbayevich: Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy Akmola region Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ
Askar Bolatovich Talkibayev: Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy Akmola region Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ
Aigul Tanabugovna Irubayeva: Law Enforcement Academy under the General Prosecutor s Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kosshy Akmola region Republic of Kazakhstan, Postal: KZ

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2016, vol. 7, issue 6, 1450-1460

Abstract: The paper deals with the practice of criminalization of trading in influence by the lawmakers of the former Soviet Union and other foreign countries Comparative approach to the solution of the criminal policy problems of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the fight against corruption was supported by the conducted sociological researches The problems of the qualification in the law enforcement activities were considered from various angles with regard to which applicable and inapplicable attributes of trading in influence in the context of the Kazakhstan legal environment were depicted In particular the comparison of this criminal action with the other crimes was carried out in the course of which trading in influence appeared to be a separate crime with its peculiar objective and subjective attributes Besides the authors considered the problems of international cooperation in the absence of criminalization of trading in influence by the legislation of Kazakhstan Particularly they also developed the legal grounds for refusal of rendering legal assistance in legal cases including for reasons of absence of the crime dual criminality The research of the international conventions and the national legislation allowed revealing the problems of regulating the cooperation in domestic standards as well as suggesting their bringing to conformity with the requirements of the United Nations Convention against Corruption As a result of the research the authors formulated the conclusion about the necessity of incorporating the Trading in Influence separate crime components to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan as well as offered the draft of the description of the punishable offence

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:6:p:1450-1460

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics is currently edited by Madalina Constantinescu

More articles in Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics from ASERS Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Popirlan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).