Legal Reform as an Administrative Decision The Risks and Performance Criteria

Valentina Yu Smorgunova (), Leksandra Dorskaia (), Dmitriy Pashentsev (), Evgeniya M Pavlenko () and Marina V Ignatieva ()
Additional contact information
Valentina Yu Smorgunova: Department of Theory of Law and Civil Legal Education Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia St Petersburg Russia, Postal: RU
Leksandra Dorskaia: Department of International Law Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia St Petersburg Russia, Postal: RU
Dmitriy Pashentsev: Department of Theory and History of State and Law Moscow City Teacher Training University Moscow Russia, Postal: RU
Evgeniya M Pavlenko: Department of International Law and Human Rights Moscow City Teacher Training University Moscow Russia, Postal: RU
Marina V Ignatieva: Department of International Law Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia St Petersburg Russia, Postal: RU

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2016, vol. 7, issue 6, 1494-1499

Abstract: The article discusses various approaches to the definition of the concept of legal reform legal reform is the reform of legislation or legal reform is the change of the sense of justice It is shown that the decision to start the development and implementation of a legal reform in any country of the world can only be taken by public authorities The successful as well as the failed reforms are attributed to social upheaval Risks of legal reforms implementation are identified and characterized The quality of life improvement can be associated with an increase in material well being and expressed in greater security the preventive measures of the state to prevent the commission of crimes raising the level of legal awareness the development of law enforcement practice It is human and civil rights that can serve as the indicator that reveals the true purpose of a specific legal reform The possible classification of legal reforms and the criteria for their performance are analyzed stability of certain legal reforms temporary certainty improve in the quality of life if not every member of society but the majority parallelism of legal reforms and reforms in the public system small number of laws compliance of national legislation with international legal standards state of legal education

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:6:p:1494-1499

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics is currently edited by Madalina Constantinescu

More articles in Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics from ASERS Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Popirlan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).