The Application of Article 359 of the Criminal Code in the Investigation of the Death of Post Operative Patients

I Gusti Ayu Handayani (), I Ketut Seregig (), Teguh Prasetyo () and Ardi Gunardi ()
Additional contact information
I Gusti Ayu Handayani: Universitas Sebelas Maret Indonesia, Postal: ID
I Ketut Seregig: Universitas Bandar Lampung Indonesia, Postal: ID
Teguh Prasetyo: Universitas Satya Wacana Indonesia, Postal: ID
Ardi Gunardi: Universitas Pasundan Bandung Indonesia, Postal: ID

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2017, vol. 8, issue 5, 1517-1525

Abstract: The incident of the death of three post operative patients in a line at Mitra Husada Pringsewu hospital Lampung on April 5 2016 had emerged the decline of public confidence toward hospitals both public and private hospitals The symptoms in the patients body before they died were convulsion and decreased consciousness Based on dr Ahmad Assegaf Sp An an anesthesiologist if post operative impact occurs then a person who takes responsibility is an anesthesiologist This means that responsible for the death of these patients was the doctor who performed anesthesia before the operation All three patients who died after operation in Mitra Husada Pringsewu Hospital respectively were Reyhan Mahardika suffered from varicocele Suripto patients with tumor in the left leg calf and Devi Pranita who performed caesarean section sesco ciceasria These patients underwent convulsion and decreased consciousness after operation although the anesthesiologist had tried to save their life Yet these patients died During the operation the doctor had operated the use of SOPs Standard Operating Procedures Based on the information from the Chairman of IDI Indonesian Doctors Association and the Chairman of MKEK Honors of Medical Ethics Assembly they said that dr Edi Pramono Sp An as the anesthesiologist had done the right procedures in doing anesthetic injection to these patients In the investigation process conducted by the Regional Police of Lampung toward dr Edi Pramono Sp An he was presupposed in violation of Article 359 of the Criminal Code KUHP which stated whoever due to his negligence has caused another person s death will be sentenced with a maximum imprisonment of five years In juridical study over Article 359 of the Criminal Code committed by the writer in the cases described above it can be concluded that the element of negligence as the main requirements of this article is not fulfilled Thus this Article applied in this case does not meet the main requirement of criminal elements which is presupposed and the investigation process is terminated

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:5:p:1517-1525

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics is currently edited by Madalina Constantinescu

More articles in Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics from ASERS Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Popirlan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).