 Russian Court Interpretation of Legislative Measuresfor Advanced Training and or Professional Training of the Selected Employed Population Aged from 25 to 65 YearsAlexander Zavgorodniy (),
Ilya Vasilyev (),
Nelli Diveeva (),
Marina Filippova () and
Mikhail Kharitonov ()
Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2018, vol. 9, issue 1, 342-351 Abstract: In this article we present the first generalization and analysis of decisions made by Russian courts of general jurisdiction from 2009 to 2016 for the application of provisions of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation the Federal Law of November 21 2011 No 323 FZ On the fundamentals of protecting the health of citizens in the Russian Federation the Federal Law of July 3 2016 No 238 FZ On independent qualification assessment the Federal Law of December 29 2013 No 273 FZ On education in the Russian Federation the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 28 2013 No 966 On licensing educational activities adopted to fulfill the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7 2012 No 599 About measures to implement the state policy in the sphere of education and science in the field of advanced training and or professional training of employed population aged from 25 to 65 years As a result we have made several conclusions Firstly if periodical advanced training is a mandatory condition for admission to work for example for medical workers then courts using separate methods of protecting rights of citizens in particular health care should understand the consequences of these decisions Secondly the imposition of administrative sanctions in accordance with Part 3 of Article 19 20 of the Code of Administrative Offences due to the non systematic increase in the professional level of educators recommends improving the algorithm for substantiating the gross violation of license requirements Thirdly the legal status of a person who has concluded an agreement on advanced training differs from that of an apprenticeship contract and the guarantees for this person are not established by Articles 203 205 but rather Article 187 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation Therefore courts should not qualify a contract on advanced training as an apprenticeship contract Fourthly if advanced training is not designated for employees as additional qualification and an employer does not have the duty to pay for this training then the resolution of a possible dispute should be based on whether the employer s interest is realized or not Fifthly the impossibility of an employee to work should be objective and compulsory which is assessed by the law enforcer based on the balance of rights and interests of both parties of the corresponding employment contract Sixthly the legal regulation of the independent assessment of working qualification requires its improvement and alignment with norms of the labor legislation of the Russian Federation Date: 2018 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:342-351 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics is currently edited by Madalina Constantinescu More articles in Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics from ASERS Publishing |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.