EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

OPINIONS ON THE THEORIES OF SAVAGE AND DE FINETTI

Michael Brady ()
Additional contact information
Michael Brady: College of Business Administration and Public Policy, Department of Operations Management, California State University, Dominguez Hills, USA, Postal: US

Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, 2017, vol. 8, issue 2, 137-143

Abstract: Feduzi, Runde and Zappia (2012, 2014, 2017) have claimed repeatedly that de Finetti and Savage formally allowed imprecise , indeterminate, non-additive probabilities to be used by decision makers in their normative theory of decision making .The only way that non additivity can be formally incorporated into a decision theory is by the use of a variable similar to Keynes’s w or Ellsberg’s ρ. Nowhere in anything written by de Finetti and/or Savage in their lifetimes does any such variable appear in their formal theoretical analysis or in any of their supporting axioms. Savage stated that he did not know how to integrate such a variable that would take account of vagueness, into the additive probability measure that represented his formal, normative theory. Feduzi, Runde and Zappia (2012, 2014, 2017) have misinterpreted the de Finetti and Savage concerns and sympathy for vacillating ,indecisive decision makers, who were confronted with vague and ambiguous evidence, with their recognition that defining one’s personal probabilities can be a difficult task ,with the erroneous and mistaken belief that de Finetti and Savage incorporated a role for imprecise and indeterminate probabilities within their formal, subjectivist, normative theory of probability and their SEU decision theory ,which rests completely on additive probability.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srs:jtpref:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:137-143

Access Statistics for this article

Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields is currently edited by Laura UNGUREANU

More articles in Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields from ASERS Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Claudiu Popirlan ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:srs:jtpref:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:137-143