Household income and satisfaction with life: cognitive – emotional impact paradox

Aistė Dirzytė (), Ona Gražina Rakauskienė () and Vaida Servetkienė ()
Additional contact information
Aistė Dirzytė: Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania
Ona Gražina Rakauskienė: Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania
Vaida Servetkienė: Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2016, vol. 4, issue 2, 198-210

Abstract: Much of the discussion over satisfaction with life has focused on the significance of income. Some researchers argue that cognitive factors (expectations, social comparisons, life evaluations, schemas) is the mediating part between income and subjective wellbeing, however, positive psychology suggests that happiness determines the effect of social comparison itself. This paradox could be titled “cognitive - emotional impact paradox”. We have chosen to explore this paradox and investigate the relationship between household income, cognitions, emotions, and satisfaction with life in Lithuania, as various studies, including “World Value Survey”, indicate Lithuania is among the countries demonstrating very low scores on happiness of population even though its’ economy grew fast when this country regained its’ independence in 1991. This paper presents some results of the survey which was conducted in 2016 (representative sample, n=1001). The analysis of data has demonstrated that when people get low household income per month, they report more intense negative emotions and less positive emotions. Secondly, our results suggest that people getting low household income per month express more negative cognitions and less positive cognitions. Thirdly, the results demonstrated strong relationship between cognitions, emotions, and satisfaction with life. Moreover, the results contribute to the empirical literature on “income – happiness” relation by demonstrating that household income has no significant direct effect on satisfaction with life, but there is a significant effect of household income on basic cognitions, which have a significant effect on emotions. Subsequently, basic cognitions and emotions have an effect on satisfaction with life. However, “cognitive – emotional impact paradox” needs further exploration.

Keywords: household income; subjective wellbeing; happiness; Lithuania (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A14 D63 I31 R20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/14/Dirzy ... l_impact_paradox.pdf (application/pdf)
https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/97 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:198-210

DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2016.4.2(7)

Access Statistics for this article

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues is currently edited by Manuela Tvaronaviciene

More articles in Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues from VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Manuela Tvaronaviciene ().