The investment climate in Latvia's, Lithuania's and Belarus's cross-border regions: the subjective-objective assessment

Alina Ohotina (), Olga Lavrinenko (), Jevgenij Gladevich () and Dainis Lazdans ()
Additional contact information
Alina Ohotina: Daugavpils University, Latvia
Olga Lavrinenko: Daugavpils University, Latvia
Jevgenij Gladevich: Daugavpils University, Latvia
Dainis Lazdans: Daugavpils University, Latvia

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2018, vol. 6, issue 2, 767-780

Abstract: As the world experience indicates, the favourableness of investment climare or, in other words, a region’s entrepreneurial environment determines a region’s sustainable development. First assessments of investment climate were developed and applied by western experts in the middle of the 1960s. They were based on the subjective assessment of countries’ characteristics. The further development of the methodology for comparative assessment of countries’ investment climate started to expand and complicate the system of characteristics assessed by experts, and to introduce objective statistical indexes. In recent decades, more research into investment climate at the level of regions appeared, as a result of the understanding of a specific and unique character of regional features, as well as its dramatic differences from the country as a whole. It is possible to distinguish objective, subjective, and subjective-objective metholologies for assessment of investment climate. According to the outcomes of the subjective-objective assessment of the investment climate in Latvia’s (Latgale), Lithuania’s (Vilnius, Alytus, Utena, Panevezys, and Kaunas counties), and Belarus’s (Vitebsk, Grodno, Minsk, Brest oblasts, and Minsk city) cross-border regions, the regions under study were divided into 4 groups in accordance with W.Zapf’s Well-being Typology Matrix: 1) low objective and subjective indicators – "Deprivation", 2) low objective indicators and high subjective indicators – "Adaptation", 3) high objective indicators and low subjective indicators – "Dissonance", 4) high objective and subjective indicators – "Well-being".

Keywords: investment climate (entrepreneurship enviroment); subjective-objective assessment; cross-border regions; W. Zapf’s Well-being Typology Matrix (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L26 M21 O11 R11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/22/Ohoti ... ctive_assessment.pdf (application/pdf)
https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/251 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:767-780

DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(20)

Access Statistics for this article

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues is currently edited by Manuela Tvaronaviciene

More articles in Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues from VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Manuela Tvaronaviciene ().