EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

'A paradise for profiteers'? The importance and treatment of profits during the First World War

Anthony J. Arnold

Accounting History Review, 2014, vol. 24, issue 2-3, 61-81

Abstract: When the First World War started, the British government adopted a policy of 'business as usual'. This came under pressure as a result of both military difficulties and public concerns over 'profiteering', leading to discussions between the government and interest groups and the 'Treasury agreement' in 1915. The agreement paved the way for the transition to a 'total war economy' that was central to the war effort. This paper examines the process that raised industrial profit levels to such political importance during the war and the ways in which profits were treated by the government during and immediately after the war. Corporate secrecy, suspicions that the state was less than even-handed in its dealings with capital and labour, and individual instances of high profits increased public concern, but did not establish the true levels of profit making. The study reviews the available information on profits and also provides new data on the distribution of those profits across a number of major industrial groups in order to provide a more definitive perspective on the extent to which the business sector was or was not able to 'profiteer' during the First World War.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21552851.2014.963950 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:24:y:2014:i:2-3:p:61-81

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/rabf21

DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2014.963950

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting History Review is currently edited by Stephen Walker

More articles in Accounting History Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-24
Handle: RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:24:y:2014:i:2-3:p:61-81