Double entry and the rise of capitalism: keeping a sense of proportion?
Steven Toms ()
Accounting History Review, 2016, vol. 26, issue 1, 25-31
The paper addresses the debate raised by the reinterpretation of Dean, Clarke, and Capalbo (2016) of the origins of double-entry bookkeeping (DEB) and its implications. It offers a critique based on three aspects: the role of value, the relationship between DEB and algebra, and the historical sequencing of the adoption of DEB, the rise of capitalism and the ‘capitalist mentality’, industrialisation and the Global Financial Crisis. It reinterprets each aspect and concludes on the implications for teaching, stressing the importance of all aspects of asset valuation.
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:26:y:2016:i:1:p:25-31
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Accounting History Review is currently edited by Stephen Walker
More articles in Accounting History Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().