 Putting all their eggs in one basket? Portfolio diversification 1870–1902Janette Rutterford and Dimitris P. Sotiropoulos Accounting History Review, 2016, vol. 26, issue 3, 285-305 Abstract: There are a number of reasons why investor portfolio characteristics are of interest. First, there is limited evidence of what individual investors actually held in their portfolios in the past, including, for example, whether there were significant differences between male and female investors. Second, investors’ portfolio holdings are relevant to the debate on the ‘democratisation’ of investment and, third, they inform the debate on whether investors in the past made efforts to reduce portfolio risk through diversification, before the full ‘scientific’ approach of the early-twentieth century and the Markowitz optimisation approach of the mid-twentieth century. This research explores the portfolio choices made by a sample of 508 investors – 263 men and 245 women – between 1870 and 1902. Evidence of diversification exists, with the average holding of the sample being 4.6 securities. There is also evidence of increasing levels of diversification over time, of international diversification, and greater diversification by wealthy men and women. Investors in the past clearly made efforts to reduce portfolio risk before Markowitz optimisation. Date: 2016 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acbsfi:v:26:y:2016:i:3:p:285-305 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2016.1219464 Access Statistics for this article Accounting History Review is currently edited by Stephen Walker More articles in Accounting History Review from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.