Fair Value Accounting: The Eternal Debate – AinE EAA Symposium, May 2018
Araceli Mora,
Anne McGeachin,
Mary E. Barth,
Richard Barker,
Alfred Wagenhofer and
Peter Joos
Accounting in Europe, 2019, vol. 16, issue 3, 237-255
Abstract:
The last financial crisis led to a vigorous debate still in place about the pros and cons of fair-value accounting (FVA). While detractors basically argue its potential negative impact on procicality and financial stability or inadequacy in illiquid markets or specific business models, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) pushed to extend FVA in the new financial instruments standard and issued IFRS 13 to clarify its meaning and application. Some empirical research shows the usefulness of fair value accounting information to investors and contradicts its negative impact on stability, while other studies argue about its limitations in the contracting and stewardship role of accounting. The panelists of this symposium will present their views to contribute to the debate, which should be of interest not just to academic researchers, but also to practitioners and standard setters to deal with implementation issues and potential needs to address in the standards.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2019.1664754 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acceur:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:237-255
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAIE20
DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2019.1664754
Access Statistics for this article
Accounting in Europe is currently edited by Lisa Evans
More articles in Accounting in Europe from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().