Legal Certainty, European-ness and Realpolitik

David Alexander

Accounting in Europe, 2006, vol. 3, issue 1, 65-80

Abstract: The stimulus for this paper is an article published in 2005 by Wüstemann and Kierzek together with a critical comment thereon by Nobes in 2006. The original paper discusses the IFRS proposals, and the philosophy they represent, concerning revenue recognition. Nobes, in terms which this author broadly supports, criticises their revenue recognition proposals in some detail, together, again rightly, with some of their assumptions. This paper, rather than reopening these specific issues, considers the explicit statement, for example, p. 71, and elsewhere, that there is a 'requirement of legal certainty in the European Union', a statement which is given neither logical justification nor supporting references. IAS, EU requirements and GoB as a national concept are all argued to be flexible, judgemental and, necessarily and permanently, devoid of 'legal certainty'. Implications of this analysis for regulation, harmonisation and for educational programmes in today's global environment are considered.

Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180600920194 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acceur:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:65-80

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAIE20

DOI: 10.1080/09638180600920194

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting in Europe is currently edited by Lisa Evans

More articles in Accounting in Europe from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().