The Discount Rate of IAS 36 -- A Comment

Erlend Kvaal

Accounting in Europe, 2010, vol. 7, issue 1, 87-95

Abstract: Discussing the guidance in IAS 36 on how to determine the discount rate for present value measurements of impairment reviews, Husmann and Schmidt ( Accounting in Europe , 5, pp. 49--62, 2008) conclude that the standard's option to use ‘the entity's incremental borrowing rate’ should be removed. I argue that their conclusion is based on a misconception about what is meant by incremental borrowing, and that the incremental borrowing rate may be a useful approximation to the cost of capital within a Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) framework. The reference to it is even more useful if CAPM is deemed not to hold. An important objection to the IAS 36 rules on the discount rate is that they are so different from the US GAAP rules: the former are detailed and adhere closely to the CAPM ideal, whereas the latter are general in nature, superficial and lack theoretical underpinnings. Any modification of the accounting standards' rules on the discount rate should first seek to remove that gap.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17449480.2010.485378 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acceur:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:87-95

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAIE20

DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2010.485378

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting in Europe is currently edited by Lisa Evans

More articles in Accounting in Europe from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().