Ideological reactions to Sarbanes–Oxley

C. Richard Baker

Accounting Forum, 2008, vol. 32, issue 2, 114-124

Abstract: The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 has been generally seen as a legitimate response to a significant crisis in the capital markets. Not often acknowledged, however, is the observation that the law's overarching emphasis on restoring credibility to the capital markets is revelatory of a deep ideological commitment to maintaining the capitalist system which is inherent in the American political structure. Intriguingly, several groups have emerged in recent years which stand in opposition to the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. On the face of it, the efforts of these groups appear to contradict the law's intent of restoring credibility to the capital markets. This paper describes certain of these groups and the ideological claims that have been advanced with respect to their arguments. While it will be seen that the Sarbanes–Oxley Act has some weaknesses which might be corrected, it has generally been a progressive piece of legislation that has contributed to increased levels of transparency in financial reporting and a greater independence of auditors. While these goals might be viewed as self-serving measures intended to protect the interests of capital, they may also be seen as beneficial to society in a larger sense. Credible financial reporting and independence of auditors helps to provide greater societal control over corporations. In the absence of explicit multinational structures to reign in corporate power, it is difficult to conceive of any other potential control mechanisms apart from effective systems of financial reporting and corporate governance.

Date: 2008
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.accfor.2007.11.002 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:accfor:v:32:y:2008:i:2:p:114-124

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/racc20

DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2007.11.002

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting Forum is currently edited by Carol Tilt

More articles in Accounting Forum from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().