The effects of cognitive reflection and work experience on financial statement comparability under principles-based accounting standards

Leonardo P. Barcellos, Ricardo L. Cardoso and Rodrigo de O. Leite

Accounting Forum, 2025, vol. 49, issue 2, 449-471

Abstract: This study examines the influence of cognitive reflection and work experience on certified public accountants’ (CPAs’) classifications of assets and cash flows under principles-based accounting standards and, ultimately, on the comparability of the resulting financial statements. We explore the overlapping guidance provided by the International Financial Reporting Standards on audiovisual content (AVC) classifications to experimentally show that CPAs who are high (versus low) in cognitive reflection make less noisy choices when classifying assets and cash flows. CPAs high in cognitive reflection are also more likely than others to recognise cash flows from AVC assets as operational regardless of the asset classification. We also find that experience in listed, large, or audited firms reduces noise in CPAs’ classifications of cash flows, but it is unlikely to affect their classifications of assets.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01559982.2023.2285637 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:accfor:v:49:y:2025:i:2:p:449-471

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/racc20

DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2023.2285637

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting Forum is currently edited by Carol Tilt

More articles in Accounting Forum from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().