 Audit fee determinants and the large auditor premium in 1900Derek Matthews and Michael Peel Accounting and Business Research, 2003, vol. 33, issue 2, 137-155 Abstract: In recent years there has been increasing interest among researchers in the accounting field in the issue of audit fees. This article applies the methodology of these studies to a set of UK company data for the year 1900. The problems of collecting the historical data are discussed, and a descriptive treatment of the audit market 100 years ago and the similarities and differences with today are outlined. A sample of 121 quoted companies in 1900, which declared their audit fees along with other data in their published accounts, is utilised and the determination of these fees is modelled. The results with regard to the importance of size, complexity, industrial sector, the profitability of the auditee and the start-up costs of the first years of the audit were found to be in line with contemporary findings. The main factor out of step with existing research is that the leading auditors in 1900 did not charge a premium as the present day Big 4 (formerly 6) appear to do. This is explained by the fact that big firms today offer a wider, international, and therefore perhaps more valuable set of audit services than did the largest firms in 1900. Date: 2003 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:33:y:2003:i:2:p:137-155 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729640 Access Statistics for this article Accounting and Business Research is currently edited by Vivien Beattie More articles in Accounting and Business Research from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.