Do professional risk funds affect audit quality?

Qihui Gong, Xiaomei Han, Huihui Shen and Qiuhang Xing

Accounting and Business Research, 2021, vol. 51, issue 6-7, 777-799

Abstract: In China, audit firms are required to maintain ‘professional risk funds’. These funds can be used only to pay civil compensation caused by deliberate or gross negligence in auditing activities. Using Chinese data from this peculiar regulatory characteristic, we investigate the impact of audit firms’ professional risk funds on audit quality. We find that the higher the audit firms’ professional risk funds, the lower the discretionary accruals. This finding is more pronounced for client firms with higher information asymmetry or weaker corporate governance. Further tests indicate that the higher the professional risk funds, the greater the audit effort invested in the auditing process, while audit fees do not change significantly. Our results suggest that higher professional risk funds ultimately improve audit quality by increasing audit effort.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2021.1911778 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:51:y:2021:i:6-7:p:777-799

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RABR20

DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2021.1911778

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting and Business Research is currently edited by Vivien Beattie

More articles in Accounting and Business Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().