The differential effect of accrual-based and real earnings management on audit fees: international evidence

Ahrum Choi, Eugenia Y. Lee, Sunyoung Park and Byungcherl Charlie Sohn

Accounting and Business Research, 2022, vol. 52, issue 3, 254-290

Abstract: This study investigates the relative importance of accrual-based earnings management (AEM) and real earnings management (REM) as reflected in audit fees. Auditors charge not only for AEM, but also for REM, because it increases the litigation risks and audit complexity they face by dampening firms’ long-term fundamentals; however, whether auditors charge more for AEM or for REM is relatively unexplored. Using data from 24 countries, we find that auditors, on average, charge a higher premium for REM than for AEM. We also find that a strong legal regime increases the audit fee premium charged on both AEM and REM, where the premium for REM increases to a greater extent than it does for AEM. Overall, our results provide novel evidence of the relative importance of the different types of earnings management under different legal regimes to auditors.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2021.1911779 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:52:y:2022:i:3:p:254-290

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RABR20

DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2021.1911779

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting and Business Research is currently edited by Vivien Beattie

More articles in Accounting and Business Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().