Corporate governance, firm strategy disclosure, and executive compensation
Anna Agapova and
Nikanor Volkov
Accounting and Business Research, 2025, vol. 55, issue 6, 639-667
Abstract:
We empirically investigate the relation between the quality of corporate governance and the propensity of executives to offer investors guidance on firm strategy. Using a hand-collected data set, we demonstrate that companies with lower managerial entrenchment, i.e. better corporate governance, are less likely to disclose strategic information. This result is contrary to the traditional agency argument, but consistent with investor-management disagreement theory (Thakor 2015, Strategic information disclosure when there is fundamental disagreement. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 24 (2), 131–153). Per disagreement theory, better-governed firms have less incentive to disclose such information. By not sharing information pertaining to their strategies, these firms reduce the probability that investors who disagree with their plans will deny them funding. Our empirical results also suggest that executives who do offer guidance on their firm’s strategy receive higher compensation.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2024.2381500 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:55:y:2025:i:6:p:639-667
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RABR20
DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2024.2381500
Access Statistics for this article
Accounting and Business Research is currently edited by Vivien Beattie
More articles in Accounting and Business Research from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().