A comparison of two common approaches for estimating marginal effects in binary choice models

Jeremy Verlinda

Applied Economics Letters, 2006, vol. 13, issue 2, 77-80

Abstract: Two approaches for estimating marginal effects are examined: conditioning on sample means and averaging across observations. The difference between the two quantities are signed and it is found that the magnitude increases with both the slope parameters and the covariates' variability.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article& ... 40C6AD35DC6213A474B5 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:13:y:2006:i:2:p:77-80

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504850500392149

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().