A bias in measuring consumer responses towards food safety issues due to imperfect substitution between foods

Hyun Joung Jin

Applied Economics Letters, 2014, vol. 21, issue 12, 823-827

Abstract: This study attempts to show that observed consumption change may not correctly depict consumer opinions and responses towards food safety issues due to the lack of suitable substitutes for foods with controversial safety. If there is no suitable alternative for consumers to alter their eating habits, consumers may not change consumption patterns, although they feel that consuming problem foods is risky. This study provides empirical evidence of this phenomenon using a consumer survey regarding the 2010-2011 foot and mouth disease outbreak in South Korea. The results show that the ratio of respondents who did not cease consumption of the implicated products due to lack of a suitable substitute was sizeable. This suggests that when we utilize observed consumption data, we may underestimate consumer responses to food safety issues.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2014.887182 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:21:y:2014:i:12:p:823-827

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2014.887182

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().