Which precious metals spill over on which, when and why? Some evidence

Jonathan Batten, Cetin Ciner and Brian Lucey

Applied Economics Letters, 2015, vol. 22, issue 6, 466-473

Abstract: Much academic and investor analysis and commentary see the four main precious metals as a single market, integrated and to some degree with each metal a substitute for the other. This proposition, which can be explicit or implicit, can be challenged on economic and statistical grounds. Using the Diebold and Yilmaz (2009) methodology, we show that the market is only weakly integrated, that this degree of integration is time varying and that it differs as between returns and volatility.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (73)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2014.950789 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Which Precious Metals Spill Over on Which, When and Why? – Some Evidence (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:22:y:2015:i:6:p:466-473

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2014.950789

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().