The Easterlin paradox worldwide

Matthias Opfinger

Applied Economics Letters, 2016, vol. 23, issue 2, 85-88

Abstract: The Easterlin paradox states that, although richer people report higher levels of well-being within one country, no such relationship exists across countries or over time. Several authors disagree and claim a robust positive relationship. A percentage increase of income always leads to higher well-being. This article reassesses the relationship, but analyses regional differences. I find that the positive relationship is strong in Eastern Europe, the Middle East and North African countries and Latin America. The relationship is not significant in Western Europe and Asia. In North America/Oceania and Sub-Saharan Africa, the marginal effect even becomes negative. Materialistic attitudes or the degree of collectivism may serve as explanations for the findings.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2015.1051650 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:85-88

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1051650

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().