Game, set and match: the favourite-long shot bias in tennis betting exchanges
Isabel Abinzano,
Luis Muga and
Rafael Santamaria
Applied Economics Letters, 2016, vol. 23, issue 8, 605-608
Abstract:
We test for the existence of Favourite-Longshot Bias (FLB) in tennis betting exchanges. Despite these being order-driven markets, with no direct participation from bookmakers, we have found very similar results to those obtained by Lahvička (2014) for bookmakers’ betting markets: the bias is stronger in matches between lower-ranked players, in later round matches and in high profile tournaments. This suggests that bookmakers’ adjustments to respond to informed betting are not the main driver of FLB. The varying magnitude of the bias across different types of event in the main market also weakens arguments linking FLB to gamblers’ risk preferences, and suggests the need to consider the microstructure features of the market together with the cognitive biases highlighted in the behavioural finance literature.
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2015.1093074 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:23:y:2016:i:8:p:605-608
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1093074
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips
More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().