Testing under a special form of heteroscedasticity

Helmut Farbmacher and Heinrich Kögel

Applied Economics Letters, 2017, vol. 24, issue 4, 264-268

Abstract: In the presence of heteroscedasticity, conventional standard errors (which assume homoscedasticity) can be biased up or down. The most common form of heteroscedasticity leads to conventional standard errors that are too small. In this study, we discuss the conditions under which conventional standard errors are too large. In such settings, standard tests of heteroscedasticity may fail and leave the heteroscedasticity undetected. This is particularly problematic as power gains can be achieved when testing for the causal effect in such settings.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2016.1181827 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:24:y:2017:i:4:p:264-268

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAEL20

DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2016.1181827

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Economics Letters is currently edited by Anita Phillips

More articles in Applied Economics Letters from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().